Posts: 274
Threads: 21
Joined: Jan 2016
07-06-2016, 11:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-06-2016, 11:11 PM by The_Epic_Legend.)
This will be a simple 3 answer poll, the question is
Do You Want A Server Reset Of Some Sort?
This would mean a reset of the Overworld & its Nether (maybe the end) or some sort of thing like make a new map, leave old one, just flipping the table and scraping it all, or combanations, I just wanna know what people support
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE STAFF'S DECISION, NOR IS IT SAYING TO DO ANYTHING, JUST ME MAKING AN UNBIASED POLL TO SEE HOW EVERYONE FEELS
Posts: 1,188
Threads: 45
Joined: Dec 2015
Nope.
-0,0 days without a sh*tpost
-Forum dwelling since 2015!
Posts: 164
Threads: 32
Joined: Dec 2015
God. I hate the idea of everyone resetting. Some people can just part with stuff. :/
Posts: 15
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2016
07-07-2016, 01:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-07-2016, 01:18 AM by Rividium.)
If they made an official poll to decide the reset, they should add the following option:
* Do not reset, add a new fresh world alongside the current one (perhaps delete the resource world to make room for it)
This way both sides will be satisfied. People who want to keep their builds and people who want a new fresh empty world to build on. Items can be taken from one world to the other (separate inventories for each world is a bad idea) and neither world would ever be reset.
What do you think, guys? Would you choose this option?
Posts: 1,176
Threads: 22
Joined: Feb 2016
07-07-2016, 01:53 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-07-2016, 01:54 AM by Nether_Ruler.)
I hate the idea of a Reset
So as Rasse declared.... "Nope."
(07-07-2016, 01:17 AM)Rividium Wrote: If they made an official poll to decide the reset, they should add the following option:
* Do not reset, add a new fresh world alongside the current one (perhaps delete the resource world to make room for it)
This way both sides will be satisfied. People who want to keep their builds and people who want a new fresh empty world to build on. Items can be taken from one world to the other (separate inventories for each world is a bad idea) and neither world would ever be reset.
What do you think, guys? Would you choose this option?
And Yes Riv, I would
Posts: 41
Threads: 4
Joined: Dec 2015
(07-07-2016, 01:17 AM)Rividium Wrote: If they made an official poll to decide the reset, they should add the following option:
* Do not reset, add a new fresh world alongside the current one (perhaps delete the resource world to make room for it)
This way both sides will be satisfied. People who want to keep their builds and people who want a new fresh empty world to build on. Items can be taken from one world to the other (separate inventories for each world is a bad idea) and neither world would ever be reset.
What do you think, guys? Would you choose this option?
It'd cause a split in the community, with some players restarting and some not. Allowing items to be taken would give players with better items an unfair advantage in the new world. It'd also take up hella file space.
star was here
dk was too
so was vil
Grimm was here, too.
Posts: 1,176
Threads: 22
Joined: Feb 2016
(07-07-2016, 01:54 AM)Zanycat Wrote: (07-07-2016, 01:17 AM)Rividium Wrote: If they made an official poll to decide the reset, they should add the following option:
* Do not reset, add a new fresh world alongside the current one (perhaps delete the resource world to make room for it)
This way both sides will be satisfied. People who want to keep their builds and people who want a new fresh empty world to build on. Items can be taken from one world to the other (separate inventories for each world is a bad idea) and neither world would ever be reset.
What do you think, guys? Would you choose this option?
It'd cause a split in the community, with some players restarting and some not. Allowing items to be taken would give players with better items an unfair advantage in the new world. It'd also take up hella file space.
Maybe they shouldn't let items be transferred. just like MVTP, no items transferred whatsoever
Posts: 41
Threads: 4
Joined: Dec 2015
(07-07-2016, 01:56 AM)Nether_Ruler Wrote: (07-07-2016, 01:54 AM)Zanycat Wrote: (07-07-2016, 01:17 AM)Rividium Wrote: If they made an official poll to decide the reset, they should add the following option:
* Do not reset, add a new fresh world alongside the current one (perhaps delete the resource world to make room for it)
This way both sides will be satisfied. People who want to keep their builds and people who want a new fresh empty world to build on. Items can be taken from one world to the other (separate inventories for each world is a bad idea) and neither world would ever be reset.
What do you think, guys? Would you choose this option?
It'd cause a split in the community, with some players restarting and some not. Allowing items to be taken would give players with better items an unfair advantage in the new world. It'd also take up hella file space.
Maybe they shouldn't let items be transferred. just like MVTP, no items transferred whatsoever
That doesn't stop the split community problem or the file space problem.
star was here
dk was too
so was vil
Grimm was here, too.
Posts: 1,176
Threads: 22
Joined: Feb 2016
Well the community might not have to be completely split. I mean, mvtp still allows the same chat, and we would still be able to tp to each other, but yeah the shops would sorta be fucked
Posts: 15
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2016
07-07-2016, 02:43 AM
(07-07-2016, 02:28 AM)Nether_Ruler Wrote: Well the community might not have to be completely split. I mean, mvtp still allows the same chat, and we would still be able to tp to each other, but yeah the shops would sorta be fucked
It would be best to just make it so inventories and balances are same for both worlds, would only leave the 0.1% that want economy to be reset unsatisfied, satisfies everyone else on the server.
