[Grrawesomeness]

(10-01-2018, 07:28 AM)derpedo Wrote: You say it was a mistake, however your actions say otherwise. Ink_Mashiro had placed a build above a sea temple they were planning to renovate, along with a sign saying "Claimed by Ink_Mashiro;" the sign which you decided to remove and replace with a new sign saying "No one owns natural stuff." Seems pretty intentional to me.

https://prnt.sc/l0mstg

When I did a rollback on the radius of the sea temple for you specifically, there were approximately 400 blocks removed, along with 3 elder guardians. 

https://prnt.sc/l0mtf4

Ah, I can see where the problem lies. My understanding of natural structures, as I observed earlier that day in the chat, was that no single player could own a naturally spawned structure as I saw staff discussing it, if my memory serves, it may have been Hiyoko discussing that players couldn't own such temples and other naturally spawning structures and claim them for their own. (Though my memory isn't the greatest, my assumption of who could have mentioned it in chat could very much be wrong, though I know for fact I did in fact see a staff member discussing such things in the HomeTown visual chat), so, when I came across the temple, of which was yet to be defeated, I used the logic of what I saw earlier and reaped what I saw fair game.

It is still to my understanding that players must build upon these structures in order for their to be proper claim, as I saw discussed, and a simple sign claiming the area did not count, as mentioned by the staff discussing it, and all I saw was the single sign, and the single chest. There was no additional build to the temple as far as I'm aware.

Though, if one were to wish for me to return the blocks that I took from that specific temple, I would not have a problem in returning the blocks taken, and simply taking more caution in what naturally spawned structures to take from.