[illogicalsong]

(03-30-2020, 10:52 AM)RushingBadger Wrote: Why should you be unbanned: i think i should be unbanned because i had no idea that was a players house if it was a players house at all. i just thought it was a random pillager house. it wasn't claimed or anything. yes there was a few things that looked like a player placed them but as i said before it wasn't claimed so there was no indication that a player owned it.  

Ok. First off. This is what a pillager outpost looks like




And This  is what the house that you tore down looks like.



Now. Just in case you forgot the /rules and the tutorial you had to go through- Let me remind you. Player builds are always protected, regardless of if there's a claim or not. If you are unsure you should ask someone, not destroy the structure.






1) Had this been a pillager outpost, pillagers would have been spawning around it

2) Had this been a pillager outpost, it would've been modified, as this is very clearly not a vanilla structure.

3) There is no way you didn't know this house was not owned because you left all the chests that were locked that you couldn't break, as well as the person's owned dog.







There is so much evidence in this house to indicate that it was owned and I do not believe you didn't know it wasn't.

Appeal denied.

You can start a new appeal in a new thread