[blakethegoat3456]

I was banned on smp

My username is blakethegoat3456
 
I was banned for greifing

I was banned by Melaniebeedot

The reason I was banned for greifing and not listening when told to stop It was a village surrounded by deepslate I broke two deepslate and placed it back to get in I asked if i could build near it and mel came I got tp'd out by mel I went back in by breaking two blocks and placing them back I was placed in jail then banned by melaniebeedot.

I want to be unbanned cause this is a good server and i feel like i can make a friend on it. and i Love the peaple on this server there so friendly and I wanna continue playing.

                                                            That's my ban apeal and im very sorry.

[melaniebeedot]

You didn't include your entire ban reason, and you didn't actually admit to everything that happened. I'll give you a chance to update your appeal if you'd like to tell the full truth before I tell it for you.

[blakethegoat3456]

Ok mel

Sorry for not including my hole ban reason

My username is blakethegoat3456

I was banned for griefing repedetly when being told to stop

I was banned by melaniebeedot

I wanna make new friends and have fun and play minecraft

I am very sorry for my actions

---

If i recall thats what im banned for

[melaniebeedot]

You seem to be struggling with the whole truth. Let me help you out.




Your appeal should look like this:

Quote:Server you were banned on (SMP/Discord): SMP

Minecraft username: blakethegoat3456

Reason for your ban (exactly what it says when you try to log in!): griefed your way into a build, again, after i told you not to.

Why should you be unbanned (Why should we give you a second chance?): here's where you try to convince me to let you back, why should i let you back, not what you want to do if you come back

Why do you want to come back: here's where you can talk about what you want to do if you're allowed back

Now let's tell the whole truth of what happened the day you were banned.

You found a village encased in cobbled deepslate walls with a glass roof:



You are told by 2 players that you can't alter or build near it because it was clearly made by someone and belongs to them, you insist it's unclaimed and it has no owner.

I arrive on scene to check it out, and begin to roll back the holes of grief in the walls and ceiling. I roll back a 2x1 hole, and you immediately break the blocks again and enter the build. I remind you this is grief...



You then enter the build through another hole in the enclosure. I move you back up to the top of the glass roof where you entered, and roll back the hole in the glass.



I continue searching the build for grief and any signs of an owner. You wait impatiently from above.




You enter the build again through another hole. I tell you to get out, and roll back the hole.



A player asks for you to return their drill before you get banned while it's in your inventory. You insist you won't be banned because you haven't even gotten a /warning yet and can't get banned for too many warnings. Then I see you inside the build yet again somehow, and I throw you in jail. 



While muted in jail, you decide that spamming is the next best course of action. And then you laugh about it.



I come to find through your block logs that you broke another hole in the wall to get in, and placed the blocks back.



At this point I decide that your trolling and wasting staff time has gone on long enough, and I ban you for griefing your way into a build, again, after i told you not to.


Now I'll give you one more try on your response to "Why should you be unbanned (Why should we give you a second chance?)"

Remember, you're trying to convince me why I should be giving you a second chance after you griefed again after I had just told you that breaking your way into the build is grief, and after I had to repeatedly remove you from the build, and after I had to jail you finally the 3rd time I caught you inside, why should I let you back when it's clear you have no intentions of following our rules or listening to staff?