He has the right AND the reasons to roast them. They did something wrong and they know it, but refuse to accept it. Everyone can see ban appeals anyways, Grimm was just stating the obvious. Also, an "appeal denied" wouldn't do much to highlight their mistakes and make them fix it.
If they act professionally and maturely and take responsibilities for their own actions immediately all these wouldn't have happened. If he's bad at English make an appeal anyways just insert a note saying "i'm bad at English". That shows Grimm immediately that he takes the responsibility and he is making an effort instead of making someone write the appeals for him or copying someone else's appeal. Make a proper appeal, make a proper apology, if they think Grimm is wrong then produce the proper evidence. Counter-grilling Grimm without reason is not a good way to go down. I mean, why go through all these crooked paths when there's a paved road in front of them?
If they act professionally and maturely and take responsibilities for their own actions immediately all these wouldn't have happened. If he's bad at English make an appeal anyways just insert a note saying "i'm bad at English". That shows Grimm immediately that he takes the responsibility and he is making an effort instead of making someone write the appeals for him or copying someone else's appeal. Make a proper appeal, make a proper apology, if they think Grimm is wrong then produce the proper evidence. Counter-grilling Grimm without reason is not a good way to go down. I mean, why go through all these crooked paths when there's a paved road in front of them?