[Grimm_Wolfe]

Well, here's the deal, and it goes along with what Osh said.

Within the overview of all evidence between Purple, Viktor, and Creeper; there's only the truth or falsehood.  That's a tautology in logical reasoning, which means it's always right.  All of this hinges on whether or not Creeper's told me the truth via PM.

If Creeper was telling the truth, then Viktor didn't put in any effort to being unbanned and Viktor had Ceeper lie on their behalf for the x-raying offense.  In the case of Purple, Creeper reused their ban appeal for Viktor on account of Purple's laziness to not even produce their own appeal.  In this case, neither party took responsibility for the creation of their appeals or actions.

If Creeper wasn't telling the truth, then Viktor and Purple made their own appeals.  In this case, Viktor straight up lied to me and Purple plagiarized Viktor out of laziness.

In either case, should I reward or tolerate their laziness or lies?  Would you reward or tolerate laziness or lies, Inferno?  Or how about anyone you know?  I would've been more than willing to help them be unbanned, as I've done with many others before them.  I'm quite amiable only if people put in the effort, which they did not.

---

(09-29-2017, 11:20 PM)Infernoclaw6790 Wrote: When I said joke I meant the responses of the first few people. I also still don't understand how what I said in my original messages was rude.

Seriously?  If I just came up out of nowhere and called you a score of negative adjectives, would you not consider that rude and uncalled for?

Secondly, the fact your second mail to me essentially said, "forget what I said earlier"-to me-sounds like you knew what you said was rude, regretted it, and then decided "screw it, gotta commit now" and re-sent a new version of the original comment.