[victorycry]

I kind of agree with sky on this one personally. I mean, if he was offline for the full duration of the mute, and logging off doesn't actually circumvent the mute, then I'd say he paid that in full and the second mute seemed uncalled for to me. A second mute would seem like trying to force someone through something they already went through.

Also, last I read, the rules don't say you have to be online during a mute. And whether online or not, your still not talking, and are cooling down. Which is what the mute is meant for.

That being said, it's a mute. It's not a ban, or even a temp ban. The mute is more than likely over now, and the lesson learned (I hope). Anything after that is just being an activist and trying to change the server. Just learn from what happened.

Just my personal opinion, doesn't change anything.